School Crisis Management of Criminology Students At Guimaras State College

Abstract

This study was conducted to determine the level of school crisis management among criminology students. The subject-respondents of the study were the criminology students of Guimaras State College in terms of age, sex, year level, family monthly income, boarding status, scholarship, and religion. Likewise, the relationship between the extent of school crisis and the crisis management of the criminology students were determined. The CCJE students of Guimaras State College was experiencing a moderate level of school crisis in both environmental and organizational sources while a low to moderate school crisis level for personal school crisis has been experienced but the disagreement of the majority has been identified for mean school crisis level values of organizational and personal sources while their positive agreement was observed in environmental school crisis. A no significant difference was found for every the profile variable sub-group. Crisis management was a strategy of the individual in order to cope-up or relieve from the experienced school crisis from different sources. The CCJE students were directly stated the agreement if sublimation mechanism as applicable for the three sources as their response was agreed but noticeably it could be applicable for experiencing organizational school crisis. For the introjection crisis management, the overall response of CCJE students was undecided to apply this type of coping in the three identified sources but still considerable as their crisis management as it was positively agreed by the majority. Regression, projection and displacement crisis management was disagreed by the respondents for its applicability to cope up school crisis from the identified sources. As the level of organizational stress experienced by the respondent increases the more they engage in introjection, projection, regression, and displacement coping mechanism and as the level of personal stress increases the more the respondents will engage to projection and introjection.